ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PPT , 页数:42 ,大小:206KB ,
资源ID:1107759      下载积分:10 文钱
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,省得不是一点点
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.wenke99.com/d-1107759.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: QQ登录   微博登录 

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(中国社会保障制度的多重分割及对人口流动的影响.PPT)为本站会员(国***)主动上传,文客久久仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知文客久久(发送邮件至hr@wenke99.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

中国社会保障制度的多重分割及对人口流动的影响.PPT

1、中国社会保障制度的多重分割及对人口流动的影响 上海社会科学院上海社会科学院 左学金左学金 2006年年 12月月 16日日厦门大学 12006年 12月 16日Increased Labor Mobility During the Reform1n In the planning period prior to late 1970s, labor mobility was generally prohibited.n The scale and the impact of labor mobility have increased since the reform, esp. the mid-

2、1980s.n The major component of the flow is the peasant workers from the middle and western province of China.厦门大学 22006年 12月 16日n Labor mobility from the low-productivity sectors to the high ones is the most importance source of Chinas fast growth in the past two decades. 厦门大学 32006年 12月 16日Increase

3、d Labor Mobility During the Reform 2n In 2005, the total volume of “floating population” amounted to 147.35 million, of which, 477.9 million were inter-provincial. The total number accounted for more than 10% of the total population. n However, this is the total stock. The incremental of the floatin

4、g population in the past 8 years was 865.1 million, accounting for less than one percent of the countrys 1.3 billion population. 厦门大学 42006年 12月 16日Increased Labor Mobility During the Reform 3n The major destinations of the mobility are the large and mid-sized cities in the Eastern provinces, while

5、the Yangtze River Delta, the Pearl River Delta and the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region being the most important concentration of the in-migration. n By province, Sichuan, Anhui, Hunan, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei are the most important sending provinces, and Guangdong, Zhejiang, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Beijing, F

6、ujian are the most important receiving provinces. 厦门大学 52006年 12月 16日Institutional barriers to mobility remain in place 1n There remains a hierarchy of Chinas population/labor by their place of household registration. n The top of the hierarchy is the provincial level cities of Beijing, Tianjin, Sha

7、nghai and Chongqing, while the bottom is the townships/villages, with the various size of cities/towns in the middle. n In general, it is easy to move downward along the hierarchy, but difficult to move upward. 厦门大学 62006年 12月 16日Institutional barriers to mobility remain in place 2n According to the

8、ir position in this hierrarchy, people are entitled to different social services, social security programs, education and employment opportunities.n Social services:n Opportunity, costs and quality of compulsory education (of their children)n Opportunities to go to college( different admission lines

9、)n Access to public health services and primary health care.厦门大学 72006年 12月 16日Institutional barriers to mobility remain in place 3n Social Security:n Social pension programsn Social health insurance programsn Entitlement to unemployment benefitn Entitlement to welfare programsn Political representa

10、tion厦门大学 82006年 12月 16日Institutional barriers to mobility remain in place 4n To certain extent, the institutional barriers to mobility has changed from the “migration policies” to “migrant policies”n Rural in-migrants in cities can not get household registration in cities, being excluded from social

11、 services and social security programs available to local urban residents厦门大学 92006年 12月 16日Institutional barriers to mobility: evidence 1n One evidence of such institutional barriers is the abnormally high urban-rural and cross-regional income disparitiesn In perspective of economics, too high urban income relative to rural income implies a too small urban labor force, or in other words, an indication of institutional barriers to rural-urban mobility. 厦门大学 102006年 12月 16日

Copyright © 2018-2021 Wenke99.com All rights reserved

工信部备案号浙ICP备20026746号-2  

公安局备案号:浙公网安备33038302330469号

本站为C2C交文档易平台,即用户上传的文档直接卖给下载用户,本站只是网络服务中间平台,所有原创文档下载所得归上传人所有,若您发现上传作品侵犯了您的权利,请立刻联系网站客服并提供证据,平台将在3个工作日内予以改正。