ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PPT , 页数:48 ,大小:7.12MB ,
资源ID:220375      下载积分:6 文钱
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,省得不是一点点
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.wenke99.com/d-220375.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: QQ登录   微博登录 

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(胰腺癌治疗进展英文.ppt)为本站会员(h****)主动上传,文客久久仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知文客久久(发送邮件至hr@wenke99.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

胰腺癌治疗进展英文.ppt

1、Howard A. Reber, MDProfessor of SurgeryUCLA School of Medicine,Pancreatic Cancer Surgical Approach in the USA - 2014,Agi Hirshberg Center for Pancreatic Diseasesat UCLA,Pancreatic CancerEpidemiology,2014 - 46,420 new cases in USA2014 - 39,590 deaths4th most common cancer killer2nd most common GI can

2、cer killer (colon #1),Pancreatic CancerEpidemiology,New Cancer Deaths , United States, 2014.,Pancreatic CancerEpidemiology,Incidence increasing 1% yearly,Pancreatic CancerEpidemiology,85% of new cases are advancedLocally advanced: blood vessels (Stage III)Distant spread to liver, lungs (Stage IV),La

3、te Presentation - Poor Survival,Howlander et al, SEER Cancer Statistics Review 2012.American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts & Figures 2013.,Stage,I,II,III,IV,Percent at diagnosis,60%,45%,30%,15%,0%,Late Presentation - Poor Survival,Howlander et al, SEER Cancer Statistics Review 2012.American Cancer So

4、ciety, Cancer Facts & Figures 2013.,24,18,12,6,0,Median Survival (mos),Stage,I,II,III,IV,0,Even “early”stage diseaseis advanced,No Surgery,If.Major blood vessels involved (Stage III)Distant metastases (Stage IV) Some Stage III may be exceptions,Pancreatic Resection,Distal Pancreatectomy (no Appleby)

5、Whipple operation (Pancreaticoduodenectomy),Standard Whipple,Standard Whipple,Roux-en-Yrarely done,Pylorus Preserving Whipple,Cure rate is same with each. Most resections arePylorus PreservingWhipples,Pylorus Preserving Whipple,Factors Influencing Survival,182 consecutive patients underwent a Whippl

6、e for pancreatic cancer between 1987 and 2005. Patients from 1987-1995 were compared with those from 1996-2005.,Study Design,Results,Survival,Biological factors related to tumorDifferentiationNodal involvementPerineural invasionResection margins,Degree of Tumor Differentiation,Actuarial survival est

7、imate for patients with well, moderately, and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (P.001).,50%,(1987-2005),Lymph Nodes,Negative,Positive,28%,22%,Actuarial survival for node-negative (solid line) and node-positive (dotted line) patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas undergoing

8、a pancreaticoduodenectomy (P.001).,38%,(1987-2005),Perineural Invasion,Negative,Positive,36%,13%,Actuarial survival for patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (P.001).,36%,(1987-2005),Resection Margins,Negative,Positive,27%,Biologic features of the tumors the

9、mselves are the primary determinants of prognosis!,27%,157 pts,(1987-2005),R0,R1,27.4%,40.9%,76.4%,All 182 Pts,Survival for Entire Cohort,All 182 Pts,(1987-2005),350 ml EBL,475 ml EBL,35.5%,15.8%,Blood Loss Influences Survival,Adjuvant Therapy,Treatment given after resection Effort to eradicate any

10、remaining microscopic tumorAll pts in USA receive chemotherapy after resection!Some in USA also get radiation,Cancer may involve HA, PV, superior mesentericvein or artery,UNRESECTABLE,Criteria for Resection,Why not resect the involved blood vessels?,Criteria for Resection,Those with vessel invasion

11、have extensive tumor with microscopic spread that cannot be removed completelyNot seen on preop scans, but experience tells us its thereIf we resect Stage III tumors, the cancer comes back quickly,“Downstaging” of PaCa,Pts given chemotherapy 6-12 mos We try to kill the microscopic tumor first Re-eva

12、luation by CT, CA19-9 Resection then possible in some First reported by our group (1998) Now more widely done in USA,So.,Effect of Chemotherapy on Tumor,Tumor: 4.4 x 3.8cmPV invasion (+),Tumor: 2.8 x 2.5cm (57% reduction)PV invasion (-),Before,After,Initial scan shows SMA involvement,6 mos scan look

13、s similar,But patient felt well and CA19-9 fell from 840 to normal.,Arch Surg. 2011;146(7):836-843. Donahue TR, Reber HA et al,When/Whether to Operate?CT Imaging,PV,SMA,SV,SMV,IMV,LRV,LGA,SA,HA,Pancreas,Adrenal,Downstaging of PaCa Survival,25+ survivors 5-17 yearsObserved five-year survival rate: 28

14、%13 more close to 5 yrs with no recurrence Possible five year survival rate: 53%,Adjuvant Therapy,Treatment given after surgery (Whipple/distal)Effort to eradicate any remaining microscopic tumorStandard approach,Neoadjuvant Therapy,Treatment given before surgery in pts with resectable disease (Stag

15、e I and II)Some in USA recommend this instead of surgery firstAdvantages and disadvantages,Theoretical Advantages,Almost all pts have micrometastatic disease at diagnosis 1 cm - 28% have metastases2 cm - 73%3 cm - 94%So almost all pts could benefit.,Iacobuzio-Donahue et al 2011 Cell,Theoretical Adva

16、ntages,If given after surgery, up to 25% may not be treated at all.If given before, more likely to be physically fit and able to tolerate treatment Or treatment may start late if there were complications,Effect of Adjuvant Treatment Delay on Survival,Iacobuzio-Donahue et al 2011 Cell,Avoid Treatment

17、 Delay After Surgery,70%,40%,Theoretical Advantages of Neoadjuvant Therapy,Identify pts unlikely to benefit from surgery During 2-3 mo treatment, up to 20% pts show metastases . . or develop poor performance status,Is This an Advantage?,Is this good or bad? Good. They are spared surgery that would n

18、ot have helped. orBad. They missed their chance for resection and possible cure.,Neoadjuvant Therapy,So why has it not become the standard approach?Several reasons are givenChemotherapy today has little effect in most pts,Neoadjuvant Therapy,At most, 1/3 of pts respond to neoadjuvant treatment.So 2/

19、3 would delay resection by 2-3 months, without effective treatment during that time.Disease could progress,Neoadjuvant Therapy,Although today Chemotherapy has little effect in most pts.This could change with more effective neoadjuvant regimens. Or with the ability to selectively choose a regimen spe

20、cific for the molecular features of each tumor,Neoadjuvant RadioTherapy,Radiation Therapy (RTx) of unclear value in most ptsRTx definitely decreases local recurrence of cancerBut it does not increase survival in most.Most pts die of distant disease (liver, lung, peritoneal) even when local recurrenc

21、e is lowSo neoadjuvant RTx also is not done by most USA surgeons,Surgery in USA -2014,Further major surgical advances unlikelyMortality rate 1%; morbidity still highImproved outcomes likely to come from more effective drugs in combination with surgeryNeoadjuvant therapy will be used moreMore downstaging with better drugs,David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA 1955 - 2014,Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center,Opened June 2008,Howard A. Reber, MDProfessor of SurgeryUCLA School of Medicine,Pancreatic Cancer Surgical Approach in the USA - 2014,Agi Hirshberg Center for Pancreatic Diseasesat UCLA,

Copyright © 2018-2021 Wenke99.com All rights reserved

工信部备案号浙ICP备20026746号-2  

公安局备案号:浙公网安备33038302330469号

本站为C2C交文档易平台,即用户上传的文档直接卖给下载用户,本站只是网络服务中间平台,所有原创文档下载所得归上传人所有,若您发现上传作品侵犯了您的权利,请立刻联系网站客服并提供证据,平台将在3个工作日内予以改正。