英语文献(有关水力学).doc

1、Dynamic response of gravity dam model with crack anddamage detectionWANG ShanShan it is very dangerous if the crack slopes downstream. The whole failure processes of the two possible failure modes of the cracked dam, i.e., overturning or sliding of the top separated block during earthquakesunder abn

2、ormal conditions, were also simulated. Some important phenomena such as the bounce of the top block and the relationship of the sliding and overturning were examined in detail. Bayraktar et al. used the Lagrangian approach to investigate the effect of base-rock characteristicson the stochastic dynam

3、ic response of dam-reservoir-foundation system subjected to different earthquake input mechanisms. Calayir et al. investigated the earthquake damage response of the concrete gravity dams. Zhu et al. studied the seismic behavior of concrete gravity dams with cracks that penetrated the monoliths. Arab

4、shahi et al. studied various possibilities of natural isolation occurring along the dam-foundation interface during an earthquake in order to evaluate the seismic response of an existing gravity dam. Long et al. conducted comparative studies to investigate the seismic response of a 160 m high gravit

5、y dam with and without reinforcement. Because many gravity dams are being constructed in the high seismic risk zones, the earthquake is a challenge to these dams. Therefore, in these previous works, most of the studies concentrated onthe safety of dam subjected to earthquake, and provide relatively

6、little information on vibration response of structure with crack. Few works focused on variation of structural dynamic behavior brought by structural damage. Many gravity dam structures, exposed to various external loadsduring their lifetime, have suffered damage and deterioration such as crack. Van

7、landuit et al. pointed out that damage in the structures alters the structural dynamic properties and response, such as stiffness, mass, damping, natural frequency, mode shape, vibration signal response, etc.Damage can seriously affect structural performance and may eventually lead to catastrophic f

8、ailure. Thus, maintaining safety and integrity of the structures and avoiding loss of human life due to the catastrophic failure of undetected damage structures require a better understanding of relationship between crack and structural dynamic response. In this paper, in order to study the dynamic

9、behavior of gravity dam with damage, the sweep vibration responses of the gravity dam with and without damage are investigated. Due to earthquakes or other reasons, gravity dams normally have damage such as cracks in practical service. The assessment of the safety of gravity dam with crack is very i

10、mportant in many engineering applications. In this case, the structural damage detection method for the gravity dam with crack plays an important role in analyzing the safety of the structure. Significant research has been conducted in the area of dynamic response-based damage detection techniques.

11、Some studies questioned the suitability of modal data for damage detection, arguing that the modal information was a reflection of global system properties while damage was a local phenomenon. For example, Todorovska et al. illustrated that most of the structural health- monitoring methods for civil

12、 engineering structures were physically based on detecting changes in the modal parameters of the structure, which were global properties, depending on the overall stiffness of the structure. Hence, they changed little when the damage was localized, and they were also sensitive to environmental infl

13、uences (e.g., temperature)and changes in the boundary conditions (e.g., soil-foundation system), which were difficult to separate and might produce similar effects as damage on the record response. Wang et al. presented a new structural damage detection method called the local damage factor (LDF), w

14、hichwas capable of determining the presence, severity, and location of a structural local damage at the same time. By including the dynamic information of the local intact structure in the LDF method, the influence of structural nonlinearity, imperfection, and system noise were considered, so that t

15、he accuracy of damage detection was improved. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed local damage factor technique could be efficiently used in local damage detection and structural health monitoring of structures. Because the weight and volume of gravity dam are very huge, it is di

16、fficult to excite or vibrate the structure. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the damagedetection in structures subject to base excitation 11. Besides evaluating the dynamic response of the gravity dams subjected to the base excitation, the other goal of model experiment of gravi

17、ty dam is to test the efficiency of local damage factor based on base excitation for the sake of damage detection of gravity dam.2 Dynamic response of gravity dam model withcrack2.1 Theoretical backgroundThe equations of motion of a structure with N degrees of freedom and viscous damping coefficient

18、s can be expressed as ; (1)tftxKtDtM/xwhere M, D, and K represent the nn mass, damping, and stiffness matrices, respectively. 、 and x are the acceleration, velocity, and /displacement vectors, respectively.f(t) is the time-dependent applied force vector. For a harmonic input, the external force and

19、displacement can beexpressed as； (2)tjeFtf； (3)XxSubstituting eqs. (2) and (3) into eq. (1) yields；(4)tjtjeFeXKDjM2From the above equation, the frequency response functionmatrix is defined asH； (5)12jThen, eq. (4) can be expressed as； (6)FXDamage in the structure alters the structural parameters. As

20、suming that damage in the structure usually causes a change in the mass M , damping D and stiffness K of the intact structure, respectively we have：； (7)Md； (8)； (9)KdIn many studies, the proportional viscous damping is used for dynamic analysis, and it is expressed as：； (10)KcMKccDddd 212121where c

21、1 and c2 are constants.From eqs. (5), (7), (9) and (10), the frequency response function matrix of the structure with damage dHis obtained as：； (11)12 ddd KDjMHThen, the vibration response of the structure with damage can be expressed as：(12)FXddThese equations also illustrate that there is a close

22、relation between the structural damage and dynamic behavior.2.2 Experimental procedureThe objective of the experimental study was to validate the variety of dynamic responses between the intact structure and damaged structure. The number 5 section model of the Jiananqiao gravity dam was considered,

23、and the test specimen is shown in Figure 1. This section of the Jiananqiao gravity dam has the dimensions of 112.0m86.7m30.0m, and the scale of the model is 1: 200. The model is made of gypsum. Six accelerators were used as the transducers to acquire the structural dynamic responses. A conceptual sk

24、etch of the location of transducers is shown in Figure 2. The structural damage on the structure was simulatedby saw-cutting a crack with a 20 mm depth on the top part of the model (see Figure 3). The excitation equipment was an electric-magnetic vibration system controlled by a COMET shaker control

25、 system. The data acquisition and analysis were performed using a dynamic analyzer with a parallel multi-channel function. In order to validate the relationship between the damage and structural dynamic behavior accurately, the dynamic responses of structure with and without damage were measured usi

26、ng the same excitation level.Figure 1 Test specimen.Figure 2 Arrangement of transducersFigure 3 Crack on the structure2.3 Experimental results and discussionThe test was conducted by vibrations of the shaking table along the selected horizontal direction (see Figure 1). The excitation force was intr

27、oduced as a sine sweep with a frequency bandwidth between 130 and 170 Hz and a constant acceleration level between 5 and 10 m/s2. The typical amplitude vs. time histories of the acceleration transducers for the dynamic responses of structures with and without crack were plotted in Figures 4 and 5, r

28、espectively. According to the amplitude vs. time histories of the acceleration transducers, the peak-peak values of structural dynamic responses were obtained and summarized in Table 1 and Figure 6 for the constant exciting acceleration level of 5 m/s2 (Case A). Similarly, the peak-peak values of st

29、ructural dynamic responses were also obtained and summarized in Table 2 and Figure 7 for the constant exciting acceleration level of 10 m/s2 (Case B). Table 1 and Figure 6 demonstrate that the peak-peak acceleration responses all increase for the structure with crack for Case A. The maximum peak-pea

30、k acceleration response difference between the intact and damaged structures is 29.1%. As shown in Table 2 and Figure 7, the values of peak-peak acceleration responses have a similar trend for Case B, and the maximum peak-peak acceleration response difference between the intact and damaged structures is 24.8%. Figure 4 Typical acceleration time history for intact structureFigure 5 Typical acceleration time history for damage structure