1、观点相反的文章The lecturer completely retorts the points of view illustrated in the passage. As the instructor presents in the lecture, (说者的整体观点) On the contrary, the reading contends an opposite stand that (作者的整体观点)The first point that the professor uses to cast doubt on the reading is (说者的第一个原因) Accordin
2、g to him / her, , because (说者支持第一个原因的细节 ), which differs from the reading stating that (作者的第一个原因)Another point that the lecture uses to counteract the reading concerns (说者的第二个原因) The professor claims that (说者支持第二个原因的细节) However, the reading states The professor also presents the concept that (说者的第三个
3、原因), which is backed up by the proposal that (说者支持第三个原因的细节) This is incongruous with the articles suggestion that (作者的第三个原因) As a final point, the listening also says that , which means that This is largely ignored by the reading text.In conclusion, the points in the lecture contrast with what is pr
4、esented in the reading. (说者的总体观点) demonstrates that (作者的总体观点) is certainly in doubt.(157 words)In general, the lecture is in the opposite of the idea that.TPO11The lecturer completely retorts the points of view illustrated in the passage.As the instructor presents in the lecture, the young reading l
5、es literature isnt as troubling as mentioned in the reading passage.The first point the professor uses to cast doubt on the reading is that other kinds of books also stimulate the readers intellectual ability. According to her, such books as science fiction are of high quality and can stimulate the
6、readers critical thinking, which differs from the reading stating that only literature can bring us benefits.Another point the lecture uses to counteract the reading concerns that not books but also other forms of art can be a wise decision, which is backed up by the proposal that music and movies a
7、re more attractive to audience than books and can have positive effect on audiences intellectual development. This is incongruous with the articles suggestion that such forms of art cant provide anything positiveThe lecture also present the concept that we should not blame the readers for the declin
8、e of literature since the writers products are too difficult to understand. However, the reading states that good literature is written but there is no audience.In general, the lecture is in the opposite of the idea that people reading less literature have negative effect.TPO2The lecturer completely
9、 retorts the points of view illustrated in the passage. As the instructor presents in the lecture, if a team is responsible for a project, there wont bring any benefit. On the contrary, the reading contends an opposite stand that working as a team is more likely to succeed and is quickly as well as
10、benefits the team members.The first point the professor uses to cast doubt on the reading is that working as a team is less likely to succeed because people in a team usually just ride off and dont contribute anything, which differs the reading stating that a team has more resources such as wide ran
11、ge of knowledge and skills.Another point that the instructor uses to counteract the reading concerns that teams dont work quickly. he professor claims that teams need long time to reach an agreement. However, the reading state that teams have more creative solutions and can work with higher efficien
12、cy.The professor also presents the concept that working in a team doesnt benefit the members, which is backed up by the proposal that the team usually gets the recognition as a whole, if it fails, everyone is to be blamed. This is incongruous with the article sggestion thatMembers in a team are more
13、 likely to shine if they are excellent.In general, the lecture is in the opposite of the idea that working in a team overweighs working on one s own.Influential personTPO1230wordsThe lecturer completely retorts the points of view illustrated in the passage. As the instructor presents in the lecture,
14、 working 4 days a week wont brings any benefit. On the contrary, the reading contends an opposite stand that working 4 days will benefit the country as well as the company and the employee.The first point the professor uses to cast doubt on the reading passage is that it cant bring more profit to th
15、e company because recruiting more workers will expand the expense on training and medical insurance. While the reading state that the company just need to pay 80 percent of the salary.Another point the lecture uses to counteract the reading concerns that this cant decease the unemployment for the co
16、untry, the professor claims that the company may raise their expectation, which means that workers have to work overtime to finish the work. However, the reading states that if workers work fewer hours, the company has to recruit more workers.The professor also presents the concept that this will no
17、t benefit individual worker, which is backed up by the proposal that they will risk reducing the quality of life with lower income and are more likely to lose jobs the economy is down. In conclusion, the lecture is in the opposite of the idea that a four-day worktime policy is more effective and can bring more profits.
