会话含义与英语中的劝说语功能分析【文献综述】.doc

上传人:文初 文档编号:22989 上传时间:2018-04-30 格式:DOC 页数:8 大小:56.50KB
下载 相关 举报
会话含义与英语中的劝说语功能分析【文献综述】.doc_第1页
第1页 / 共8页
会话含义与英语中的劝说语功能分析【文献综述】.doc_第2页
第2页 / 共8页
会话含义与英语中的劝说语功能分析【文献综述】.doc_第3页
第3页 / 共8页
会话含义与英语中的劝说语功能分析【文献综述】.doc_第4页
第4页 / 共8页
会话含义与英语中的劝说语功能分析【文献综述】.doc_第5页
第5页 / 共8页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

1、毕业论文文献综述英语会话含义与英语中的劝说语功能分析LITERATUREREVIEWFORTHEPRESENTSTUDYHERBERTWSIMONDEFINEDPERSUASIONASTHEARTOFCOMMUNICATIONWHICHDESIGNEDTOINFLUENCETHEAUTONOMOUSJUDGMENTSONOTHERSITISAFORMOFATTEMPTEDINFLUENCEINTHESENSETHATITSEEKSTOALTERTHEWAYOTHERSTHINK,FEEL,ORACT,BUTITDIFFERSFROMOTHERFORMSOFINFLUENCESIMON,HW,1

2、9867ADDRESSEDASITISTOAUTONOMOUS,CHOICEMAKINGINDIVIDUALS,PERSUASIONDISPOSESOTHERSBUTDOESNOTIMPOSEITAFFECTSPERSUADEESSENSEOFWHATISTRUEORFALSE,PROBABLEORIMPROBABLE,ASWELLASTHEIREVALUATIONSOFPEOPLE,EVENTS,IDEAS,ORPROPOSALSPERSUASIONISAPARTANDPARCELINOCCUPATIONS,SUCHASPOLITICS,LAW,SOCIALWORK,COUNSELING,A

3、DVERTISING,MARKETING,ETCINVIRTUEOFTHISANDOTHERREASONS,ITDRAWSTHECONCERNOFVARIOUSCIRCLESOFSCHOLARSATHOMEANDABROADRESEARCHERSFROMDIFFERENTSPHERESHAVEFOCUSEDONDIFFERENTASPECTSOFPERSUASIONINLINEWITHTHEIROBJECTIVEOFSTUDY1RESEARCHABROAD11THERHETORICAPPROACHPERSUASIONCANBEDATEDBACKTOTHEANCIENTGREECE,WHICHH

4、ASSTOODFORCENTURIESWITHOTHERBRANCHESOFHUMANITIESSUCHASPOLITICS,LITERATURE,LAW,ANDRELIGIOUSSINCEGREEKPHILOSOPHERARISTOTLEFIRSTSYSTEMATIZEDTHESTUDYOFPERSUASION,THETECHNIQUEOFRHETORICHASBEENWIDELYAPPLIEDINDIFFERENTFIELDSANDTHERANGESOFTHEIRSTUDYHASBEENGREATLYEXPANDEDHISTREATISE,RHETORIC,ISREGARDEDAS“THE

5、MOSTSIGNIFICANTWORKSONPERSUASIONEVERWRITTEN”AND“THESINGLEMOSTIMPORTANTWORKSONTHESTUDYOFSPEECHMAKING”SIMON,HW,198656TRADITIONALRHETORICISFLOURISHEDINDEALINGWITHPRACTICALMATTERSOFPERSUASIONINVOLVEDINPOLITICS,ETHICS,ANDSOCIOLOGYHOWEVER,THETRADITIONALRHETORICHASITSSHORTCOMINGSASITTAKESTHELANGUAGEPROPERT

6、YINTOCONSIDERATION,WHILEIGNORESTHEABUNDANTMATERIALOFTHEWHOLELINGUISTICINTERACTIONINCONCRETECONTEXTASONEOFTHESUBLINGUISTICS,MODERNRHETORICSTRESSEDTHEEFFECTIVENESSOFLANGUAGEANDMAKESRESEARCHONPERSUASIONACADEMICALLYITSHEDNEWLIGHTONTHESTUDYOFPERSUASIONANDBRINGSBRANDNEWPERSPECTIVEONTHESTUDYOFPERSUASIONLAN

7、GUAGEFROMANACADEMICASPECTATTHEBEGINNINGOFTHE20THCENTURY,SAUSSURE,THESWEDISHLINGUIST,PROPOSEDTHETHEORYOFDISTINGUISHING“LANGUE”AND“PAROLE”,LAIDAFOUNDATIONFORMODERNLINGUISTICS,ANDUSHEREDRHETORICINTOANEWWORLD,THUSOPENEDUPAROUTEFORTHEDEVELOPMENTANDFORMATIONOFMODERNRHETORICACCORDINGTOJOHNMCWHORTER,CONTEMP

8、ORARYRHETORICEMPLOYSTHESOCIAL,CULTURALANDETHICALASPECTSOFPERSUASION,HEHOLDSTHATPERSUASIONISANINTERACTIONTHROUGHSYMBOLISMTOLINKTHESPEAKERWITHTHERECEIVERANDRECOGNIZESTHATPERSUASIONISANACTTHATINVOLVESSOCIALANDCULTURALCONSEQUENCESJOHNMCWHORTER,200845CONTEMPORARYPRINCIPLESOFPERSUASIONAREDERIVEDLARGELYFRO

9、MPSYCHOLOGISTSANDSOCIOLOGISTSTHEYAPPROACHPERSUASIONFROMAPSYCHOLOGICALANDSOCIOLOGICALPOINTOFVIEW12THEPSYCHOLOGICALAPPROACHPSYCHOLOGISTSCENTERSONTHEDETAILEDEXPLORATIONOFHOWPERSONALMOTIVATIONINFLUENCEPEOPLESREACTIONTOOTHERSPERSUASIONANDSEEKTOEXPLAINHOWTHEIRMENTALITY,BELIEFSORVALUESAREFORMEDANDHOWTHEYAR

10、EENCOURAGEDBYGIVENSTIMULATEELEMENTSASWELLSCHOLARSINTHISFIELD,SUCHASMASLOW,ARGUESTHATANINDIVIDUALISMOTIVATEDBYHISINHERENTNEEDSANDANUNFULFILLEDNEEDWOULDBEMOTIVATEDWHICHSERVEGROUNDSFORPERSUASIONADRIANAKMAJIAN,200165OTHERSARGUETHATINDIVIDUALSHASABUILTINSENSEOFCOGNITIVEHOMEOSTASISORBALANCE,SOWHENPERSUASI

11、VESTIMULICREATESIMBALANCE,INDIVIDUALSWILLSEEKTOREACQUIREASTATEOFBALANCEBYMAKINGSPECIFICANDAPPROPRIATEREACTIONTOTHEPERSUASION13THESOCIOLOGICALAPPROACHONTHECONTRARY,SOCIOLOGISTSREGARDPERSUASIONASAWAYOFCOMMUNICATIONANDPAYATTENTIONTOTHECOMMUNICATIONINTERACTIONINWHICHPEOPLEMAKETHEIRPERSUASIVEACTIVITYTHEY

12、FOCUSONTHEINTERACTIONOFTHEINDIVIDUALWITHOTHERSINPERSUASIVESITUATIONSTHESETHEORIESINCLUDESOCIALLEARNINGTHEORY,FUNCTIONALTHEORYANDSOCIALJUDGMENTINVOLVEMENTTHEORYSOCIALLEARNINGTHEORYEMPHASIZESMODELINGASAWAYOFGAININGCOMPLIANCE,FUNCTIONALTHEORYHOLDSTHATATTITUDESSERVEINSTRUMENTAL,EGODEFENSE,VALUEEXPRESSIV

13、E,ANDKNOWLEDGEFUNCTIONSSOCIALJUDGMENTINVOLVEMENTTHEORY,HOWEVER,HOLDSTHATATTITUDESARENOTFIXEDPOINTSBUTRATHERTHEREARELATITUDESOFACCEPTANCESOCIOLOGISTSPROVIDENEWWAYSOFRESEARCHTOPERSUADEPEOPLE,WHILETHEYSIMPLYTAKEPERSUASIONASACOMMUNICATIONACTANDPUTTHELANGUAGEPROPERTYASIDEITFAILSTOANALYZETHEPROPOSITIONAND

14、IMPLICATUREOF“WHATISSAID”2RESEARCHINCHINAWESTERNERSHAVEINVESTIGATEDPERSUASIONINACONSIDERABLECOMPREHENSIVEWAYANDHAVEHARVESTEDRICHFRUITSINCHINATHEREAREAGOODSTOCKOFBOOKSANDARTICLESONGUIDINGANDTRAININGPEOPLETOBECOMEPERSUASIVEANDPOWERFULSPEAKERSANDMANYOFTHEMADOPTANDADAPTWESTERNACHIEVEMENTSINADDITION,MANY

15、CONCRETEFIELDSSUCHASADVERTISEMENT,LAW,EDUCATION,NEGOTIATION,POLITICS,BUSINESS,ANDSOONAREINVOLVED,ESPECIALLYTHEPERSUASIONINADVERTISINGANDECONOMYDIFFERENTSCHOLARSINDOMESTICHAVELAUNCHEDRESEARCHONPERSUASIONFROMVARIOUSPERSPECTIVESPREVIOUSSTUDIESFOCUSONTHEARTANDSTRATEGIESOFPERSUASIONANDMOSTRESEARCHERSHAVE

16、DIGINTOITFROMTHEANGLEOFCROSSCULTURECOMMUNICATIONWHICHINCLUDESHOWCULTUREDIFFERENCEINFLUENCETHECHOSENOFPERSUASIONTECHNIQUESANDTHERESULTSOFTHEPERSUASIONACTIVITYWITHTHEINTRODUCTIONOFPRAGMATICSINTOCHINA,CHINESELINGUISTSPUTANEWINSIGHTINTOLANGUAGESTUDIESALARGENUMBEROFSPEECHACTSSUCHASAPOLOGIES,REFUSALSANDSO

17、ON,HAVEBEENSTUDIEDWELLANDRECEIVEDFRUITFULACHIEVEMENTS,HOWEVER,BESIDESPERSUASIONTANGXIADEFINESPERSUASIONASAKINDOFSPEECHACTANDEVENMORECOMPLEXTHANOTHERACTIVITIESLIKEORDERREFUSALANDSOONTANGANALYZESPERSUASIONWITHTHEEMPLOYMENTOFTHESPEECHACTTHEORYPROPOSEDBYENGLISHLINGUISTSAUSTINSHEAPPLIESSPEECHACTTHEORYTOT

18、HISSTUDYWITHACONCEPTIONOFPERSUASIVEACTASADYNAMICCOMMUNICATIVEPROCESS3THETHEORYOFCONVERSATIONALIMPLICATUREINPERSUASIONBESIDESRHETORICIANS,PSYCHOLOGISTSANDSOCIOLOGISTSWHOHAVEGONEDEEPLYANDWIDELYINPERSUASIONSTUDYANDACCOMPLISHEDALOT,LINGUISTSAPPLIEDPRAGMATICSINPERSUASIONRESEARCHPRAGMATICSTAKESHUMANFACTOR

19、SINTOITSCONSIDERATIONANDTHEREFOREPROVIDESDYNAMICAPPROACHTOTHESTUDYOFLINGUISTICPHENOMENONPRAGMATICS,SIMPLYPUT,STUDIESHOWUTTERANCESHAVEMEANINGONTHECONTEXT,ORHAVECOMMUNICATIVEMEANINGUNDERCERTAINCONDITIONS,INCLUDINGHOWTHEMEANINGISPRODUCEDANDCOMPREHENDED,ASWELLASSTUDIESLANGUAGEAPPROPRIATENESSANDTACTFULNE

20、SSITISCLOSELYRELATEDTOPERSUASIONANDHASIMPORTANTCONTRIBUTIONSTOTHESTUDYOFPERSUASIONBYEXTENDINGTHESCOPEOFPERSUASIONRESEARCH,AMONGWHICHGRICESCONVERSATIONALIMPLICATUREISMOSTOUTSTANDING31CONVERSATIONALIMPLICATURETHEORYCONVERSATIONALIMPLICATUREWASFIRSTPROPOSEDBYGRICEIN1976ITISTHETHEORYCONCERNINGHOWPEOPLEU

21、SELANGUAGEITDOESNOTSTUDYTHELITERALMEANINGOFTHEUTTERANCEFROMTHEINTERNALSYSTEMOFLANGUAGEBUTEXPLAINSTHEREALMEANINGCONVEYEDBYTHESPEAKERBASEDONTHECONTEXTITDOESNOTPAYATTENTIONTOWHATTHESPEAKERSAYSBUTFOCUSONWHATTHESPEAKERINTENDEDTOIMPLYBYSAYINGTHEUTTERANCEASGRICESAYS,ASPEAKERSENDSMOREINFORMATIONTHANTHELITER

22、ALMEANINGOFWORDSITISTRANSFERREDNOTBYENCODINGTHEUTTERANCELINGUISTICALLY,BUTBYPROVIDINGEVIDENCEOFTHEINTENTIONTHESPEAKERINTENDSTOCONVEYGRICEINSISTSTHATTHECOMMUNICATIVEACTIVITIESOFHUMANBEINGSSHOULDBEGOVERNEDBYNORMSANDPRINCIPLESDURINGHUNTINGFORTHEWAYSINWHICHSUCHPROPOSITIONISPROVIDEDBYTHESPEAKERHEMAKESITC

23、LEARTHATTHERATIONALEUNDERLINGTHECONVERSATIONALIMPLICATURETHEORYINTHEASSUMPTIONTHATRATIONALCOMMUNICATIONEXCHANGESARECHARACTERISTICALLY,TOSOMEDEGREEATLEAST,COOPERATIVEEFFORTSTOSOMEDEGREE,WHENCOMMUNICATEWITHOTHERS,ACOMMONPURPOSEORAMUTUALLYACCEPTEDDIRECTIONISRECOGNIZEDINTHEEACHPARTICIPANTTHEREFORE,ALIST

24、ENERMUSTGOBEYONDTHESEMANTICMEANINGOFWORDSTOINFERWHATTHESPEAKERINTENDEDTOCONVEYINORDERTOREALLYUNDERSTANDTHEMEANINGOFANUTTERANCE,WHICHREQUIRESTHESPEAKERSHOULDINTENDTOCOMMUNICATEANDTHELISTENERRECOGNIZETHATINTENTIONANDBEWILLINGTOCOOPERATEWITHTHESPEAKERTHATISTOSAY,THESPEAKERANDHEARERAREPRESUMEDTOOBSERVEC

25、ERTAINRATIONALPRINCIPLESOFCOMMUNICATIONTHECOREOFSUCHCOMMUNICATIVEPRINCIPLESISCOOPERATIVENESSGRICECALLSITTHECOOPERATIVEPRINCIPLESASHEPOINTSOUT,IFSOMEONECARESABOUTTHEGOALSORDIRECTIONSSETBYTHEPARTICIPANTINACONVERSATION,HEWILLBEEXPECTEDTOHAVEANINTERESTINTHEMATTERANDPARTICIPATEINTHEFURTHERACTIONSTHISCOMM

26、ONINTERESTINACOMMUNICATIONISVERYIMPORTANTITSSIGNIFICANTFORPERSUADERSTOCOMPLYWITHTHISPRINCIPLEGRICEIDENTIFIESTHEPRINCIPLESINTOFOURBASICMAXIMSOFCONVERSATIONTHESEMAXIMSAREEXPRESSEDASFOLLOWS32FOURMAXIMSOFTHECOOPERATIVEPRINCIPLETHEMAXIMSOFQUALITYTHEMAXIMOFQUALITYISCONCERNEDWITHTHEAMOUNTOFINFORMATIONTOBEP

27、ROVIDEDBYANUTTERANCE,ANDUNDERITFALLTHEFOLLOWINGMAXIMS1MAKEYOURCONTRIBUTIONASINFORMATIVEASISREQUIREDFORTHECURRENTPURPOSEOFTHEEXCHANGE2DONOTMAKEYOURCONTRIBUTIONMOREINFORMATIVETHANISREQUIREDTHEMAXIMSOFQUALITYTHEMAXIMOFQUALITYISCONCERNEDWITHTRUTHTELLING,ANDHASTWOPARTS1DONOTSAYWHATYOUBELIEVEDTOBEFALSE2DO

28、NOTSAYWHICHYOULACKADEQUATEEVIDENCEUNDERTHECATEGORYOFQULAITYFALLSASUPERMAXIM“TRYTOMAKEYOURCONVERSATIONCONTRIBUTIONONETHATISTRUE”ACCORDINGTOGRICE,IFSOMEONEFLOUTSTHISMAXIM,THENHEORSHEISTELLINGALIETHEMAXIMSOFRELATIONTHEMAXIMISVERYSIMPLEBERELEVANTTHISMAXIMCANBEINTERPRETEDASMAKESUREWHATYOUSAYISRELEVANTTOT

29、HECONVERSATIONINTHECOMMUNICATIONSITUATIONINWHICHYOUAREINVOLVEDINTHEPOINTOFTHISMAXIMISTHATITISNOTSUFFICIENTFORASTATEMENTTOBETRUEFORITTOCONSTITUTEANACCEPTABLECONVERSATIONALCONTRIBUTIONTHEMAXIMOFMANNERGRICEINCLUDEDTHESUPERMAXIM“BEPERSPICUOUS”ANDFOURCOMPONENTSAS1AVOIDOBSCURITYOFEXPRESSION2AVOIDAMBIGUITY

30、3BEBRIEFAVOIDUNNECESSARYPROLIXITY4BEORDERLYHUZHUANGLIN2006191INSHORT,THESEMAXIMSSPECIFYWHATPARTICIPANTSHAVETODOINORDERTOCONVERSEINAMAXIMALLYEFFICIENT,RATIONAL,COOPERATIVEWAYWHENEXPRESSONESELFSPEAKERSSHOULDSPEAKSINCERELY,RELEVANTLYANDCLEARLY,WHILEPROVIDINGSUFFICIENTINFORMATIONGRICESEXPLORATIONOFCONVE

31、RSATIONIMPLICATURESUGGESTSTHATTHERULESWHICHHOLDSGOODFORCONVERSATIONMAYALSOAPPLYTODELIBERATECOMMUNICATIVEPROCESS,NAMELYPERSUASIONTHEGOALOFPERSUASIONMAYBETOIMPROVETHESTATEOFTHEPERSUADEE,ORPARTLYORPRIMARILYTOCHANGEOTHERSATTITUDEORBEHAVIORNOMATTERWHATINTENTIONITIS,ITSDIFFICULTFORPERSUADERTOSUCCEEDINENCO

32、URAGINGRECEIVERTOCHANGETHEIRORIGINALATTITUDE,BELIEF,DECISIONORBEHAVIORITISIMPORTANTFORPERSUADERSTOGAINPERSUADEESCOOPERATIONTHROUGHCREATINGANINTIMATE,HARMONIOUSRELATIONSHIPANDESTABLISHTRUSTWITHPERSUADEESHOWEVER,IFTHEPERSUASIVEUTTERANCEISNOTPROPERLYPRESENT,THESPEAKERCANNOTMANAGETOENCOURAGEOTHERSTOCHAN

33、GEGRICESTHEORYOFCONVERSATIONAL“MAXIMS”PROVIDESSOMEVALUABLEINSIGHTSINTOTHECRITERIAGOVERNINGINTERACTIONALSTRUCTURESIFPEOPLEFLOUTCOOPERATIONMAXIMS,THEIRCOMMUNICATIONWILLBELESSSUCCESSFULORMAYBEAFAILUREPERSUADERSNEEDTOBEAWAREOFTHISTHESEMAXIMSAREUSEFULINANALYZINGTHEPERSUASIVEMESSAGESEFFECTIVEEXCHANGE,ACCO

34、RDINGTOGRICE,DEPENDSONTRUTHFULNESSQUALITY,PROPORTIONALITYQUANTITY,RELEVANCE,CLARITYMANNERTHESEMAXIMSCANALSOBESAIDTOREFLECTMANYCHARACTERISTICFEATURESOFTHEPERSUASIVEGENREIFWEARETOBEPERSUASIVEINTHEFULLESTSENSE,WEMUSTMEASUREOURUSEOFLOGOSARGUMENTINPROPORTIONTOTHEDISTANCEEXISTINGBETWEENTHEAUDIENCESVIEWAND

35、OUROWNWEMUSTARGUERELEVANTLY,ESTABLISHINGACONVINCINGETHOSBYOURTRUTHFULNESSANDCLARITYOFMANNER,ASWELLASMATCHINGPATHOSFULLYTOTHEAUDIENCEANDTHEOCCASIONTHESELISTEDMAXIMSSPECIFYWHATPARTICIPANTSHAVETODOINORDERTOCONVERSEINAMAXIMALLYEFFICIENT,RATIONAL,COOPERATIVEWAYLEVINSON,SC,200045INGRICEVIEWPOINT,ITISIMPOR

36、TANTTORECOGNIZETHESEMAXIMSASUNSTATEDASSUMPTIONSPARTICIPANTSHAVEINCONVERSATIONSIFSPEAKERSDELIBERATELYVIOLATETHESEMAXIMSANDHEARERSCANINFERTHEINFORMATIONCONTRARYTOSUPERFICIALINDICATIONS,PARTICIPANTSARESTILLCONSIDEREDTOBECOOPERATIVEONSOMEDEVELOPEDLEVELITISONLYBYMAKINGTHEASSUMPTIONCONTRARYTOSUPERFICIALIN

37、DICATIONSTHATTHEINFERENCESARISEINTHEFIRSTPLACEASAMATTEROFFACT,THEINFERENCESRESULTINTHEASSUMPTIONONTHEBASISOFTHEVIOLATIONOFONEORMOREOFTHEMAXIMSOROFTHECOOPERATIVEPRINCIPLEEXPLORINGHOWTOVIOLATECONVERSATIONALMAXIMSMAYALSOHAVEPERSUASIVESIGNIFICANCEMOREOFTEN,PERSUADERSFLOUTMAXIMSRATHERTHANFOLLOWTHEMPERSUA

38、SIONSALWAYSCONCEALINTENTIONANDHEDGETHATSAYINGSOMETHINGNOTCLEAROVERLOADORDOWNPLAYINFORMATIONTHATPROVIDINGINAPPROPRIATEAMOUNTOFINFORMATIONUSEPROOFORLANGUAGETHATISETHICALLYSUSPECT,ORTELLYOUSOMETHINGTHEYCANNOTPROVETOBETRUETHATSAYINGSOMETHINGTHEYLACKADEQUATEEVIDENCETOTALLYSAYSOMETHINGUNRELATED,WHICHISFRE

39、QUENTLYUSEDINADVERTISING4SUMMARYTOSUMUP,THEPREVIOUSSTUDYONPERSUASIONBOTHATHOMEANDABROADHAVEDIGINTOADEEPLEVELWHICHPROVIDEUSWITHAMEANINGFULINFORMATIONOFPERSUASIONWHICHCANBEAPPLIEDINTODIFFERENTFIELDSOFLIFEANDSTUDYHOWEVER,THESTUDYOFPERSUASIONFROMPRAGMATIC,ESPECIALLYFROMTHEPERSPECTIVEOFCONVERSATIONALIMPL

40、ICATURETHEORY,ISFRAGMENTARYANDINCOMPLETEINTHEHISTORYOFPERSUASIONSTUDIESCOMPAREDITWITHSTUDIESOFPERSUASIONINWEST,EMPIRICALSTUDIESONPERSUASIONHAVELAGGEDBEHINDINCHINATHISOVERVIEWOFTHERELEVANTLITERATUREIMPLIESTHEPOSSIBILITYANDSIGNIFICANCEOFASTUDYONENGLISHPERSUASIONLANGUAGEFROMTHEPERSPECTIVEOFCONVERSATION

41、IMPLICATURE,ASWELLASTOEXPERIENCETHEENRICHEDTOCONVERSATIONALIMPLICATUREITSHEDSANEWLIGHTONTHERESEARCHOFPERSUASIONFROMTHEPRAGMATICSANGLEANDTRIESTOOFFERSOMESUGGESTIONOFHOWTOORGANIZEINFORMATION,GETATTENTIONANDORIENTPERSUADERTOSUCCEEDINPERSUADINGPEOPLEADRIAN,AKMAJIAN2001ANINTRODUCTIONTOLANGUAGEANDCOMMUNIC

42、ATIONMASSACHUSETTSMITPRESSGRICE,HP2001ASPECTSOFREASONOXFORDOXFORDUNIVERSITYPRESSJOHN,MCWHORTER2008UNDERSTANDINGLINGUISTICSTHESCIENCEOFLANGUAGEFLORIDATEACHINGPRESSLEECH,GN1983PRINCIPLESOFPRAGMATICSLONDONLONGMANMARTINLEVINSON,SC2000PRESUMPTIVEMEANINGSTHETHEORYOFGENERALIZEDCONVERSATIONALIMPLICATUREMASS

43、ACHUSETTSMITPRESSLEVINSON,SC1983PRAGMATICSCAMBRIDGECAMBRIDGEUNIVERSITYPRESSPENELOPE,BROWNLEVINSON,SC(1987)POLITENESSSOMEUNIVERSALSINLANGUAGEUSAGECAMBRIDGEUNIVERSITYPRESSLAURA,SICOLA2010COGNITIVEPROCESSINGINSECONDLANGUAGEACQUISITIONAMSTERDAMJOHNBENJAMINSPUBLISHINGCOMPANYSADOCK,JM1998ONTESTINGFORCONVERSATIONALIMPLICATURENEWYORKACADEMICPRESSSIMONS,HW2001PERSUASIONINSOCIETYLONDONSAGEPUBLICATIONSINC崔卫、徐莉,(2010),会话含义的可取消性再探,外国语第3期。戴炜栋,(2002),新编简明英语语言学教程。上海上海外语教育出版社。胡壮麟,(2006),语言学教程。北京北京大学出版社。金立,(2006),合作与会话合作原则及其应用研究。北京中国社会科学出版社。吴炳章,(2007),会话含意推导,外语研究第3期。周建安,(1997),关于新格赖斯会话含意理论的一些看法,外语研究第2期。

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 学术论文资料库 > 文献综述

Copyright © 2018-2021 Wenke99.com All rights reserved

工信部备案号浙ICP备20026746号-2  

公安局备案号:浙公网安备33038302330469号

本站为C2C交文档易平台,即用户上传的文档直接卖给下载用户,本站只是网络服务中间平台,所有原创文档下载所得归上传人所有,若您发现上传作品侵犯了您的权利,请立刻联系网站客服并提供证据,平台将在3个工作日内予以改正。