1、硕 士 学 位 论 文论文题目： 公司股东会决议诉讼法律制度探析 专业： 诉讼法学 硕 士 学 位 论 文公司股东会决议诉讼法律制度探析Research on Lawsuit System of Resolution of CorporateShareholders Meeting1内容摘要公司股东会决议纠纷是因为股东会决议在召集程序、决议方法以及决议内容等方面存在着不合乎法律、行政法规及公司章程等方面的要求而使决议存在瑕疵，从而对决议的效力状态存在争议的一类纠纷。而公司股东会决议诉讼制度则是针对该类纠纷设置的专门诉讼救济手段。由于该类纠纷事件往往涉及较多主体的利益，具有一定程度的公益性，因此
2、在设置公司股东会决议诉讼制度时就需要考虑到该类纠纷的解决特别要兼顾纠纷的一次性解决、法律关系的稳定性与划一处理、第三人的程序保障以及诉讼经济的维持等诸多方面的特殊性要求。但现实中公司股东会决议纠纷的特殊性、复杂性以及当前我国公司法相关规定的概括性和不完整性，所以在运行该诉讼制度以解决该类纠纷时，便出现了很多问题，因此本文针对该诉讼制度存在问题较多的几个方面，通过比较法的视角，结合其他国家和地区该制度的运行与发展情况，对我国公司股东会决议诉讼制度存在的问题进行剖析并寻求可行性建议。本文除引言和结语外，主要包括三个部分。引言部分主要通过两个小的案例引出我国公司法第 22 条规定的公司股东会决议诉讼
3、制度在诉讼标的、适格当事人、判决效力几个方面存在的主要问题。主体包含三部分：第一部分：公司股东会决议诉讼之诉讼标的。首先，本部分探讨了股东决议诉讼的类型，主要从我国公司法规定的股东会决议诉讼类型的现状及存在的问题出发，结合我国台湾地区、德国、日本及韩国等国家诉讼类型的理论和实务现状，探讨了确立确认股东会决议无效和不存在诉讼的必要性；其次，在上文确立的股东决议诉讼类型的基础上，针对实务中股东会决议瑕疵呈现的几个比较复杂的情形，探讨了股东会决议诉讼标的三元论和一元论的主要理论，进而分析了在我国公司法的现状下，宜适用诉讼标的三元论来确定诉讼标的的必要性。 第二部分：公司股东会决议诉讼之适格当事人。本
4、部分针对我国公司法在股东会决议诉讼适格当事人方面存在的问题，结合其他国家和地区的制度情况，根据传统的适格当事人理论、法定诉讼担当理论及类似必要共同诉讼等相关理论，分别分析了公2司股东会决议各类诉讼的适格原告和适格被告的范围。第三部分：公司股东会决议诉讼判决之效力。首先，本部分根据我国和其他国家及地区在公司股东会决议诉讼判决效力方面存在的问题及现状，结合既判力的相关理论和股东会决议诉讼事件的特殊性，分析了在该类诉讼中既判力主观范围进行片面扩张的不合理性及进行全面扩张的必要性；其次，本部分探讨了在判决既判力进行全面扩张的基础上，该通过哪些途径为既判力向第三人的扩张寻求正当性基础；再次，本部分就法院
5、作出的股东会决议诉讼判决溯及力的时间范围进行了探讨，认为该类诉讼判决应当根据不同的情况，采用有限制的溯及力说。关键词：公司股东会决议诉讼；诉讼标的； 适格当事人；法定诉讼担当；既判力扩张1AbstractThe dispute on resolution of corporate shareholders meeting can attribute to that the calling procedure, deciding methods, content of the resolution and so on violate the law, the administrative sta
6、tutes or the articles of the company. Because of that, the legal validity of the resolution is in doubt. While lawsuit system of resolution of corporate shareholders meeting is one kind of litigating remedy which is set specially for this kind of issue. This kind of issue can usually have influence
7、on a large number of people and has a certain extent of public welfare, so the designing of the lawsuit system of resolution of corporate shareholders meeting must consider the special requirements of the issue, for instance, solving the issue once and for all, keeping the reliability of the legal r
8、elation，granting procedural insurances to the third person. But because of the particularity and complexity of this kind of issue in practice and the abstract and fragmentary of Chinas company law, many problems come when the judges using this lawsuit system solving the issues. Aiming at the main pr
9、oblems, this paper will analyze and solve these problems in the lawsuit system of resolution of corporate shareholders meeting through the perspective of comparative law.Besides the introduction and the conclusion, the main text altogether divides into three parts.The part of introduction raises the
10、 problems which exists in the twenty-second article of company law through two simple cases. The main problems include object of action, suitability of litigants, legal authority of judicial decision.Part I:the object of action in the lawsuit of resolution of corporate shareholders meeting. Firstly,
11、 in consideration of the current problems existing in Chinas company law and the theory and practice in Chinese Taibei, Germany ,japan ,Korea and so on, this part discusses the types of the lawsuit of resolution of corporate shareholders meeting and the necessity of setting invalidity litigation as
12、well as the non-establishment litigation pointed to the defected resolution; Secondly, based on the three types of the lawsuit system of resolution and several complicated defects of the resolution in practice, this part discusses the monism and trialism theory of the object of action in the lawsuit
13、 of resolution and the necessity of adopting trialism theory to determine the objects of action in the lawsuit system of resolution under the current situation of Chinas company law. 2Part II:the suitable litigants of the lawsuit of resolution of corporate shareholders meeting. In consideration of t
14、he current problems about the suitable litigants and the theory and practice in other countries or area, this part analyses the suitable litigants of the lawsuit of defective resolution respectively, mainly based on the theory of traditional suitable litigants, legal litigation executive, notwendige
15、 stneitgenossenschaft aus materiellrechtlichen grunden and so on.Part III:legal authority of judicial decision of the lawsuit of resolution of corporate shareholders meeting.Firstly, in consideration of the current problems about the legal authority of judicial decision in China and other countries
16、or area, this part analyses the unreasonable of one-sided expansion and the necessity of res judicata overall expansion,based on the theory of res judicata and the particularity of this kind of issue;Secondly, based on the theory of overall res judicata expansion, this part discusses the reasonable
17、and legitimate conditions of expanding res judicata to the third person; Thirdly, this part analyses the time range of the judicial decision of the lawsuit of defective resolution and adopts the restricted retroactivity view according to different situations.Key words:lawsuit of resolution of corpor
18、ate shareholders meeting; the object of action; the suitable litigants ; legal litigation executive; res judicata expansion1目 录引 言 .1一、公司股东会决议诉讼之诉讼标的 .3（一）公司股东会决议诉讼的类型 .3（二）公司股东会决议诉讼标的之确定 .6二、公司股东会决议诉讼之适格当事人 .10（一）公司股东会决议诉讼的适格原告 .10（二）公司股东会决议诉讼的适格被告 .18三、公司股东会决议诉讼判决之效力 .21（一）公司股东会决议诉讼判决的效力概述 .21（二）公司股东会决议诉讼判决既判力扩张的正当性基础 .27（三）公司股东会决议诉讼判决溯及力的限制 .33结 语 .35参考文献 .37致 谢 .41
