Representation of the Other in M. Butterfly.doc

上传人:gs****r 文档编号:1431902 上传时间:2019-02-27 格式:DOC 页数:5 大小:29.50KB
下载 相关 举报
Representation of the Other in M. Butterfly.doc_第1页
第1页 / 共5页
Representation of the Other in M. Butterfly.doc_第2页
第2页 / 共5页
Representation of the Other in M. Butterfly.doc_第3页
第3页 / 共5页
Representation of the Other in M. Butterfly.doc_第4页
第4页 / 共5页
Representation of the Other in M. Butterfly.doc_第5页
第5页 / 共5页
亲,该文档总共5页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、Representation of the Other in M. Butterfly【Abstract】In the Chinese American theatrical circles, David Henry Hwang has undoubtedly been “among the quintessential American playwrights, period, of his time”. The enormous success of his representative work M. Butterfly made him earn a universal acclaim

2、 as the “most renowned Asian American dramatist of the twentieth century”. 【Key Word】David Henry Hwang Butterf In Orientalism, a pioneering humanistic production for transcultural research written by Edward W. Said, he has made an exploration into the negative effects caused by the dichotomic distin

3、ction between “the Orient” and “the Occident” in terms of ontology and epistemology. The creation of the two geographical and cultural halves serves the purpose of reflecting each other for “the development and maintenance of every culture require the existence of another different and competing alt

4、er ego” (Said 1995: 35). To put it in a straight way, the very existence of the Orient acts as a foil or “the Other” to support the presence of the West itself and helps to define its self image and identity. Hence the Orient is man-made or as Said has named it, “Orientalized”, because “it could bet

5、hat is, submitted to beingmade Oriental” (Said 1979: 6). The West wouldnt represent the “mere being” about the Orient, as Wallace Stevens has stated, but construct regular constellation of ideas about it. Those unchangeable ideas can be counted as formidable as a collection of lies for the mere “air

6、y European fantasy”. In the Chinese American theatrical circles, David Henry Hwang has undoubtedly been “among the quintessential American playwrights, period, of his time”. The enormous success of his representative work M. Butterfly made him earn a universal acclaim as the “most renowned Asian Ame

7、rican dramatist of the twentieth century”. Gallimard in M. Butterfly thinks that as a Caucasian on the Oriental land he possesses a privilege and power to deserve his Butterfly even though hes not good looking and brave. He gets to believe that he could do whatever he wants to manipulate this puppet

8、, a subject without free thought or action. So after several dates with Song, he determines to carry out an experiment to test whether he has caught a Butterfly that could be left writhing in agony by piercing its heart with a needle. He refuses to have any contact with this little flower to let her

9、 wait painfully for his calls. He could hear voices from the bottom heart “I felt for the first time that rush of powerthe absolute power of a man” (Hwang 1998: 28). Song acknowledges that she could no longer hide behind dignity and has already given him her shame. Gallimard finally seizes the absol

10、ute power over his young lady. Though the witting imitation of Pinkerton-like deeds is deemed to be obnoxious and rough which would incite every mans itch to kick, very few would “pass up the opportunity to be Pinkerton”. The fantasy for an ideal Butterfly, as what V. G. Kiernan has ingeniously put,

11、 is “Europes collective day-dream of the Orient”. Other than Gallimard, the rest of Westerners in this play like Marc, one of Gallimards classmates in university, who has taught Gallimard how to flirt with woman and had sex with them on the arena of love also bears entrenched prejudice towards China

12、 and Chinese people. Their women fear us. And their mentheir men hate us” (Hwang 1998: 24). The consciousness of Western superiority has deeply rooted in every individuals mind in the West and the reinforcement of the image of “the Other” has confined his or her judgment to extremes as the particula

13、r case of Madame Butterfly. From the historical perspective we can best understand the formation of Western hegemonic ideology. The massive influence of colonialist history with its very emergence in the sixteenth century till now has never been erased from the mind of every human being. Britain and

14、 France, two greatest colonial networks, have held a vanguard position on the list of pioneer nations to set foot in the Orient. The primitive accumulation of capital relied on the naked plunderage, relentless killing, and iniquitous slave trade. To put it in a simpler way, the real purpose for the

15、colonization was for gold, God and glory. They opened up the gateway of one country after another depending on their economic and military superiority and rapidly stepped on the other nations territory. The relative strength pattern in economic, political and military power has contributed to the fo

16、rmation of the Wests national consciousness and nourished a sense of Western superiority which makes the representation of otherness to become “representations as representations, not as natural depictions of the Orient” (Said 1978: 21) Reference: 1Hwang, David Henry. M. Butterfly M.New York: Pengui

17、n Group, 1989 2Kerr, Douglas. A. “David Henry Hwang and the Revenge of Madame Butterfly” Asia Voice in English C. Ed. Chan Mimi and Harris Roy. Hong Kong:Hong Kong U.P. 1991 3Long, John Luther. Madame ButterflyN. The Century magazine, Vol. LV (Nov l897 一 Apr 1898): 374-392 4Said, Edward W. Orientalism M.New York: A Division of Random House, 1979

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 学术论文资料库 > 毕业论文

Copyright © 2018-2021 Wenke99.com All rights reserved

工信部备案号浙ICP备20026746号-2  

公安局备案号:浙公网安备33038302330469号

本站为C2C交文档易平台,即用户上传的文档直接卖给下载用户,本站只是网络服务中间平台,所有原创文档下载所得归上传人所有,若您发现上传作品侵犯了您的权利,请立刻联系网站客服并提供证据,平台将在3个工作日内予以改正。