1、二Analysis of Argument Questions 1. The following appeared as part of an annual report sent to stockholders by Olympic Foods, a processor of frozen foods.“Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient. In color film proce
2、ssing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5-inch print fell from 50 cents for five-day service in 1970 to 20 cents for one-day service in 1984. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its twenty-fifth birthday, we can expect that our long experi
3、ence will enable us to minimize costs and thus maximize profits.”下面摘自一家冷冻食品处理商（processor）奥林匹克食品提交给股东的年报：随着时间流逝，由于机构了解了做好事情的方法进而提高了效率，处理的成本会降低。比如在彩色胶卷处理方面，3/5 英寸照片的成本从 1970 年的 5 天 50cent 降至 1984 年的1 天 20cent。同样的规律适用于食品处理方面。由于奥林匹克食品即将庆祝它的 25岁生日，我们可以指望我们长期的经验会使我们达到最小的成本和最大的利润。1. false analogy: The food
4、 industry is not analogous to the color film industry. 2. causal oversimplification: Other factors that may contribute t to the cost decline of the printing cost should be considered and ruled out. 3. gratuitous assumption: The conclusion of the argument is based on a gratuitous assumption that the
5、company can minimize cost and maximize profit because the company has been conducted for 25 years.1. 错误类比：color film processing 和 processing of food 不相同。problems of spoilage, contamination, and timely transportation 都只影响 food 不影响 film. 2. 同时，忽略他因。是否是因为组织更有效率才使 COST 下降的？很可能是 material necessary for th
6、e process 下降了价钱。所以，两者更不同。3. gratuitous assumption：二十五年不代表学到了很多。很可能什么都没学到，或者技术已经 out of date.Citing facts drawn from the color-film processing industry that indicate a downward trend in the costs of film processing over a 24-year period, the author argues that Olympic Foods will likewise be able to m
7、inimize costs and thus maximize profits in the future. In support of this conclusion the author cites the general principle that “as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient.” This principle, coupled with the fact that Olympic Foods has had 25 years of experience in th
8、e food processing industry leads to the authors rosy prediction. This argument is unconvincing because it suffers from two critical flaws.First, the authors forecast of minimal costs and maximum profits rests on the gratuitous assumption that Olympic Foods “long experience” has taught it how to do t
9、hings better. There is, however, no guarantee that this is the case. Nor does the author cite any evidence to support this assumption. Just as likely, Olympic Foods has learned nothing from its 25 years in the food-processing business. Lacking this assumption, the expectation of increased efficiency
10、 is entirely unfounded.Second, it is highly doubtful that the facts drawn from the color-film processing industry are applicable to the food processing industry. Differences between the two industries clearly outweigh the similarities, thus making the analogy highly less than valid. For example, pro
11、blems of spoilage, contamination, and timely transportation all affect the food industry but are virtually absent in the film-processing industry. Problems such as these might present insurmountable 不可抗拒的 obstacles that prevent lowering food-processing costs in the future.As it stands the authors ar
12、gument is not compelling. To strengthen the conclusion that Olympic Foods will enjoy minimal costs and maximum profits in the future, the author would have to provide evidence that the company has learned how to do things better as a result of its 25 years of experience. Supporting examples drawn fr
13、om industries more similar to the food-processing industry would further substantiate 证实 the authors view.2. The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of the Apogee Company.“When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitable than it is to
14、day. Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location. Such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees.”下面摘自 APogee 公司的商务部门的备忘录： 当 Apogee 将它所有的
15、业务部门集中在一处时，它将有比现在更多的利润。因此，Apogee应该关闭它的驻外办公室并从单一场所管理它的所有部门。这样的话，集中会通过削减成本提高利润，并帮助公司更好地对所有员工进行监督。1. causal oversimplification: It is imprudent to conclude that the establishment of the field offices is the only reason explaining the decline of the profit. 2. all things are equal: The success of the ce
16、ntralization of the past does not guarantee the applicability in the future. 3. either-or-or choice: The author assumes that the centralization and the establishment of field offices are mutually exclusive alternatives, there is no middle ground between they two. In fact, we can have the field offic
17、es under centralized control.In this argument the author concludes that the Apogee Company should close down field offices and conduct all its operations from a single, centralized location because the company had been more profitable in the past when all its operations were in one location. For a c
18、ouple of reasons, this argument is not very convincing.First, the author assumes that centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and streamlining supervision of employees. This assumption is never supported with any data or projections. Moreover, the assumption fails to take into ac
19、count cost increases and inefficiency that could result from centralization. For instance, company representatives would have to travel to do business in areas formerly served by a field office, creating travel costs and loss of critical time. In short, this assumption must be supported with a thoro
20、ugh cost-benefit analysis of centralization versus other possible cost-cutting and/or profit-enhancing strategies.Second, the only reason offered by the author is the claim that Apogee was more profitable when it had operated from a single, centralized location. But is centralization the only differ
21、ence relevant to greater past profitability? It is entirely possible that management has become lax regarding any number of factors that can affect the bottom line such as inferior products, careless product pricing, inefficient production, poor employee expense account monitoring, ineffective adver
22、tising, sloppy 肥大的 buying policies and other wasteful spending. Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to diminishing profits, this argument commits the fallacy of assuming that just because one event (decreasing profits) follows another (decentralization), the second event has been c
23、aused by the first.In conclusion, this is a weak argument. To strengthen the conclusion that Apogee should close field offices and centralize, this author must provide a thorough cost-benefit analysis of available alternatives and rule out factors other than decentralization that might be affecting
24、current profits negatively.6. The following appeared as part of an article in a magazine devoted to regional life.“Corporations should look to the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or a new location. Even in the recent recession, Helioss unemployment rate was lower than the regi
25、onal average. It is the industrial center of the region, and historically it has provided more than its share of the regions manufacturing jobs. In addition, Helios is attempting to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies.”一份
26、面向地方生活的杂志上的一篇文章： 企业在寻找新的商机或位置时应该去 Helios 城。甚至在最近的衰退中， Helios 的失业率也比地区平均水平低，它是地区的工业中心，历史上它提供的比它在地区制造业工作中分享的份额中更多。而且，Helios 正试图通过吸引研究和发展革新技术的公司来扩张它的经济基础。1. 作者认为应该到该地区建厂理由是这里的失业率很高。但是却没有给出因果关系。从常理来看这是没有道理的因为失业率高的地方可能更难雇佣到雇员从而使成本增加。2. 作者认为该地区会鼓励研发，所以应该到该地区投资。但事实上就象作者说的那样该地区是制造业中心怎么可能有很多对技术和科研很熟练的人员。1， 因
27、为 H 地区 industrial and manufacturing 比较 attractive，所以那里的工人很可能只适合做这类的，如果缺乏能够做 innovative technologies and research的工人 labor pool，那么很可能导致失败。2， H 的低失业率更可能成为坏处。因为比如有 less available work force。企业必须提高 wage 才能吸引他们。提高了 COST。3， 错误的假设过去的成功能够代表未来。比方说已经饱和的资源、过分的竞争、以及可能出现的错误政策，都可能导致 H 地区的经济不再发达。In this argument c
28、orporations are urged to consider the city of Helios when seeking a new location or new business opportunities. To support this recommendation, the author points out that Helios is the industrial center of the region, providing most of the regions manufacturing jobs and enjoying a lower-than-average
29、 unemployment rate. Moreover, it is argued, efforts are currently underway to expand the economic base of the city by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies. This argument is problematic for two reasons.To begin with, it is questionable whether the ava
30、ilable labor pool in Helios could support all types of corporations. Given that Helios has attracted mainly industrial and manufacturing companies in the past, it is unlikely that the local pool of prospective employees would be suitable for corporations of other types. For example, the needs of res
31、earch and development companies would not be met by a labor force trained in manufacturing skills. For this reason, its unlikely that Helios will be successful in its attempt to attract companies that focus or research and development of innovative technologies.Another problem with the available wor
32、k force is its size. Due to the lower than average unemployment rate in Helios, corporations that require large numbers of workers would not find Helios attractive. The fact that few persons are out of work suggests that new corporations will have to either attract new workers to Helios or pay the e
33、xisting workers higher wages in order to lure them away from their current jobs. Neither of these alternatives seems enticing to companies seeking to relocate.In conclusion, the author has not succeeded in providing compelling reasons for selecting Helios as the site for a company wishing to relocat
34、e. In fact, the reasons offered function better as reasons for not relocating to Helios. Nor has the author provided compelling reasons for companies seeking new business opportunities to choose Helios.8. The following appeared in the editorial section of a corporate newsletter.“The common notion th
35、at workers are generally apathetic about management issues is false, or at least outdated: a recently published survey indicates that 79 percent of the nearly 1,200 workers who responded to survey questionnaires expressed a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign
36、 of benefits programs.”一份社团实事通讯的编者按： 一般认为工人对管理事务缺乏兴趣的观点是错的，或至少是过时的。最近公布的调查显示回答了问卷的近 1200 工人中的 79表达了对公司重组，利润目标新设计的高度兴趣。1. survey is doubtful: Detailed information should be given such as the absolute number of workers of that corporation.2. insufficient sample: The corporation is not representative o
37、f all the other corporations.3. gratuitous assumption: It is natural that workers are interested in the topics such as corporate structuring and design of benefits programs. This trend can not be cited to support the authors allege.Based upon a survey among workers that indicates a high level of int
38、erest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, the author concludes that workers are not apathetic about management issues. Specifically, it is argued that since 79 percent of the 1200 workers who responded to survey expressed interest in these topics, the notion t
39、hat workers are apathetic about management issues is incorrect. The reasoning in this argument is problematic in several respects.First, the statistics cited in the editorial may be misleading because the total number of workers employed by the corporation is not specified. For example, if the corpo
40、ration employs 2000 workers, the fact that 79 percent of the nearly 1200 respondents showed interest in these topics provides strong support for the conclusion. On the other hand, if the corporation employs 200,000 workers, the conclusion is much weaker.Another problem with the argument is that the
41、respondents views are not necessarily representative of the views of the work force in general. For example, because the survey has to do with apathy, it makes sense that only less apathetic workers would respond to it, thereby distorting the overall picture of apathy among the work force. Without k
42、nowing how the survey was conducted, it is impossible to assess whether or not this is the case.A third problem with the argument is that it makes a hasty generalization about the types of issues workers are interested in. It accords with common sense that workers would be interested in corporate re
43、structuring and redesign of benefits programs, since these issues affect workers very directly. However, it is unfair to assume that workers would be similarly interested in other management issuesones that do not affect them or affect them less directly.In conclusion, this argument is not convincin
44、g as it stands. To strengthen it, the author would have to show that the respondents account for a significant and representative portion of all workers. Additionally, the author must provide evidence of workers interest other management topicsnot just those that affect workers directly.9. The follo
45、wing appeared in the opinion column of a financial magazine.“On average, middle-aged consumers devote 39 percent of their retail expenditure to department store products and services, while for younger consumers the average is only 25 percent. Since the number of middle-aged people will increase dra
46、matically within the next decade, department stores can expect retail sales to increase significantly during that period. Furthermore, to take advantage of the trend, these stores should begin to replace some of those products intended to attract the younger consumer with products intended to attrac
47、t the middle-aged consumer.”财经杂志的意见栏： 一般而言，中年消费者的零售消费额的 39用于专卖店的商品何服务。而在年轻一些的消费者中这一比例仅有 25。由于中年消费者的数量在下一 10 年中将大幅增长，专卖店可以预期他们的销售额会有大幅增长。进一步，为利用这一趋势，这些店应该开始将一些吸引年轻消费者的商品替换为吸引中年消费者的商品。1. The absolute value of consumption should be given by the author.2. all things are equal3. Whether the increase of p
48、rofit gained by attracting more middle-aged consumers will be offset 4. by the reduction of profit because of the loss of young consumers.Sample essay 1:The argument that department retail sales will increase in the next 10 years and thus department stores should begin to replace products to attract
49、 middle-aged consumers is not entirely logically convincing, since it omits certain crucial assumptionsFirst of all, the argument ignores the absolute amount of retail expenditure of middle-aged and younger consumers devoted to department store products and services. Although younger consumers spend a smaller percentage of their retail expenditure to department store products than do the middle-aged consumers, they might actually spend more in terms of the absolute amount.Even if middle-aged consumers are spending more than younger ones in department stores, the argument i
