1、1Dialogue speech in linguo-didactic interpretationAbstract: One of the most important problems of language teaching is developingstudents speaking skills, which is considered to be in a close relation withstimulating their cognitive abilities as a whole. Expressing ones ideas in a foreign language p
2、resupposes possession of a minimum of lexical and phraseological units that can allow reading, speaking, listening and writing on the level required by educational curricula. Continuous and constant learning of a particular number of words and phraseological units can be achieved only in case of the
3、ir regular use in speech. In other words, the criteria of identifying the level of students knowledge is the number and the quality of lexical and phraseological units they learnt. Key word: dialog;dialogue speech;system;phraseology 1.Dialogue speech Dialogue is known to be the most natural form of
4、language 2existence. Priority of this form of oral speech is due to the social nature of language, its communicative structure. The formation of a specific macrosystem which is the result of general language system actualization on the level of speechformation. Here we should take into consideration
5、 the interpretation of a system suggested by H.Glinz : “System is the highest form of organization of multitude, where peculiarities of order (elements are located according to particular rules) and the pecularities of organization (elements are distributed into groups according to rules) can be obs
6、erved” Besides, a system as the highest form of organization is characterized by new features: 1) a set representing the system, functions as a complete unity, marked with some relevant characteristics (indicators of the system); 2) distribution of realia takes place basing not only on simple rules
7、(the rule usually does not apply to the whole set, and it has a lot of exceptions), but it is based on objectively existing regularities or laws that have a high degree of necessity”. So dialogical speech is first of all characterized by those linguistic phenomena whose usage is the result of the ch
8、ange of roles between speakers and listeners, of stimulation 3and reaction. Thus, for this type of speech the following features are peculiar: frequent use of different types of questions, imperative utterance, different structures expressing agreement, disagreement and other shades of reaction (H.
9、Altmann 2008: 102-103). Such linguistic phenomena peculiar to monologue speech as elliptical structures, incomplete statements, repetition, contacting elements, expressive means of subjective-modal plane also impart characteristic of dialogical speech to certain statements. But these phenomena have
10、higher frequency in dialogue and they often have different shape, and sometimes different functions. Thus, for example, contacting means in the dialogue are not only observed more often than in monologue, but also personal forms reflecting the situation of correlation between the speakers are seen more often in their structure. They do not only express the record of the addressee, but also take into account his reaction, his involvement into the process of speech.
