1、1The Chinese UndergraduatesSuicide Probability：Gender Differences（Guangdong Ocean University，Zhanjiang ，Guangdong Province 524088，P.R.China） Abstract. Objective To Explore the gender differences of the college students suicide probability. Methods By means of cluster sampling method, a total of 6794
2、 undergraduates were tested with the Suicide Probability Scale (SPS). Results there are significantly gender differences on SPS items, sub-scales and total scale（p0.05）, and the number or detection rates as well (p0.0001).Conclusion The gender differences of the Chinese college students suicide prob
3、ability is significant. Key words: Undergraduates; Suicide Probability; Gender Difference 1 Introduction International Suicide Research found a significant difference between suicide and gender. The suicide rate of Most countries is higher in men than women, the ratio is about 3:11;But the attempted
4、 suicide rate of women was significantly higher than male, the ratio is 1:32.Only in 2China the suicide rate of female is about 25% higher than men, mainly due to the very high suicide rate among young women in rural areas: The suicide rate in rural areas among young women is higher than that of you
5、ng men by 66% 3.Some academics have also found 4, that 15-24 years old is the peak period of female suicide, whether in urban or at rural. They say two female commit suicide successfully when one man did. But the male suicide rate increased with age, and the increased suicide rate is roughly close t
6、o that of female by 55-64 age groups. Over the age of 75, the suicide rate of male is higher than that of female. This article explores the gender differences of the Chinese college students suicide probability. 2 Method Participants Participants consisted of 6794 college students (4162 males and 26
7、32 females) at a comprehensive university in southern China. Participants ranged in age from 14 to 25 years, with the mean age being approximately 20 years, (M=19.5; SD=0.9). Procedures The suicide possibility Scale (SPS)5 advanced by Cull and Gill in 1982, a total of 36 items, using the 0-4 score t
8、o assess the frequency of an individuals subjective feelings or 3behavior for the population of more than 14 years old, above the fourth grade of educational level. The higher the score, the greater suicide risk. SPS are widely used among college students 6,the offender 7,substance abuse 8 and the m
9、entally ill 9.The Chinese version 10 have the same good reliability and validity as the original scale 11,Switzerland 12and Turkey 13. The Chinese Version of SPS was input into an online software system of psychological test. All classes finished it online in the same week. SPSS18.0 was used for the
10、 statistical analysis. 3 Results SPS Analyses of the Gender Differences See Table 1 for means and standard deviations of SPS items by gender. Gender differences were explored using t-tests. The results indicated that males and females differed significantly on 23 of 36 items (P0.05), with males scor
11、ing significantly higher than females on 13 items. The scores on subscales also differed significantly（p0.05）, with males scoring higher than females on 3 of 4 subscales. The SPS total scale score of boys is even higher than girls, reached statistical significance level (p 0.001). The SPS Rate of Ge
12、nder Differences 4Based on the average score for boys and girls, SPS total score was changed into the standard T-score, 50 for mean, 10 for the standard deviation. According to the standard T-score of the SPS total score, all participants were divided into five groups, the number and rate of each gr
13、oup are listed on table 2. 4 Discussion This study indicates gender differences in the SPS of Chinese college students are very significant on items, or subscale and total scale, with boys are significantly higher than girls. Though Cull and Gill (1988) and subsequent researchers as Tatman, Greene,
14、and Karr, (1993) 5 were not found gender differences of SPS, Eltz, Evans and Celio (2007) proposed that women have scored significantly higher than men on 13 of 36 items of the SPS (p 0.01), and interpreted as “women are more honest than women.“ 9 Our analyses show that this is not the case for Chin
15、ese college students. Gender differences are also significant in the number and rate of the SPS. Although there is not a clear demarcation criteria for the SPS in the international community, Valadez and Granello (2009) 8 pointed out that the SPS standard T score 50 or more means the increased risk
16、of suicide; 5Individuals who score more than 60 require a detailed clinical interview to assess suicide risk; more than 70 points, is considered a great risk of suicide, need immediate intervention or immediately hospitalized. In this study, gender differences in the SPS of Chinese college students
17、are very significant with boys （9.2%）are significantly higher than girls（5.5%）.The SPS rate is 14.6%, which is close to the results of other studies of suicidal ideation in China14,15. Fund Human and Social Sciences Fund of Ministry of Education ( 09YJCXLX003 ) References 1 Huang Runlong. Gender dif
18、ferences of suicide population in recent 21 years in China. Chinese Northwest population，2011，32（1）：59-63. 2 Xiao Shuiyuan, Wang Xiaoping, Xu Huilan. Several issues in the suicide research and prevention work in our country. Chinese Journal of Psychiatry，2003，36（3）：129-131. 3 Phillips M.R., Li X., Z
19、hang Y. Suicide rates in China, 1995-99.Lancet，2002，359：835-840. 4 Zhang J, Jiang C, Jia SH, et al. An Overview of Suicide Research in China. Archives of Suicide Research,2002,6(2):167-184. 65 Tatman S.M., Greene A.L., Karr L.C. Use of the Suicide Probability Scale (SPS) with Adolescents. Suicide an
20、d Life-threatening Behavior, 1993, 23(3):188-203. 6 Bagge C., Osman A. The Suicide Probability Scale: Norms and Factor Structure. Psychological Reports, 1998, 83: 637-638. 7 Naud H.,Daigle M.S.Predictive Validity of the Suicide Probability Scale in a Male Inmate Population.Journal of Psychopathology
21、 Behavior Assessment,2010,32:333-342. 8 Valadez A., Granello P. F., Juhnke G. A., et al. The Suicide Probability Scale: A Means to Assess Substance Abusing ClientsSuicide Risk. Journal of Professional Counseling Practice Theory and Research, 2009, 37(1): 51-65. 9 Eltz M., Evans A. S., Celio M., et e
22、l. Suicide Probability Scale and its Utility with Adolescent Psychiatric Patients. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 2007, 38(1): 17-29. 10 Liang Yingnan, Yang Lizhu. The reliability and validity of the suicide probability scale. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology,2010,18(2):225-227. 11 Larz
23、elere R.E.,Smith G.L.,Lisa B.S.,et el.Predictive Validity of the Suicide Probability Scale among Adolescents in Group Home Treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Child 7and Adolescent Psychiatry,1996,35(2):166-172. 12 Eskin M. Swedish translations of the Suicide Probability Scale, Perceived S
24、ocial Support from Friends and Family Scales, and the Scale for Interpersonal Behavior: A reliability analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1993, 34(1):276-281. 13 Eskin M. Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Perceived Social Support from Friends and Family Scales, Scale for Interperso
25、nal Behavior, and Suicide Probability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1993, 49(4):515-522. 14 Yang Xuelong, Tong Huijie. College students commit suicide risk assessment and related social and psychological factors. Chinese Journal of Clinical psychology,2010,18:694-697. 15 Joan Chen, Hong Yuehui, Yang si. The function of Stressful life events, self-esteem and depression in the formation of the suicidal ideation. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology,2010,18(2):190-192.
